It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CalebRight14
The UK apparently does not work to save preemies that weigh under a pound, as they are not deemed "viable".
www.theblaze.com...
Originally posted by CalebRight14
This is what happens when government decides who gets care and who doesn't. Coming to a US state near you soon. Enjoy all you voted for in 2008 and 2012
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by CalebRight14
Welcome to Health Care offered with all the compassion a state can supply. God help us all.
Originally posted by crazyewok
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by CalebRight14
Welcome to Health Care offered with all the compassion a state can supply. God help us all.
If you dont like what the state provides why not just pay to go private like you would anyway?
What we do in the UK if we are not happy with the NHS, unless your poor....but then they would of got nothing in the USA anyway.edit on 26-12-2012 by crazyewok because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by elouina
So according to your statistics, 1.4 children out of a hundred are born under 3 pounds. Not very rare at all. In fact it is similar to the birth control pill failure rate.
I think it should be up to the parents as to if children under a pound should be "saved". Since they are the ones that would have to contend with possible complications. I think most would say yes, but at least then the ball is in their court.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Wow.. Where do I begin? If I don't like it...my problem? No... if I don't like it, I adjust my life's course to go somewhere I can DO something ABOUT it. Which, I am doing...by the way. Change takes time..and even getting to a position to help make it come takes time. When I'm not left to die cold and alone because I didn't weigh enough, at least I was "granted" the "gift" of having that time.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Now I don't believe you are familiar ..at almost any level...with American Medicine as it's practiced at the moment. It may change, and many expect it to..but right now? Poor or Rich makes no difference in basic levels of respect and treatment to save life here.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Oh, to go to extraordinary means? Hell yeah money talks. Need cancer therapy? Need transplants? You're probably best to make life what you can while you have some left. TRUE on that.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Basic life saving and life maintenance? Well, the college I go to is more about a certain Health program than anything ELSE they offer...funding, resources.. etc. It means medical is all over ...and that is above the fact my city has TWO Tier 1 regional trauma centers with enough support to leave almost nothing without an office to treat it here.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Living here? I'm surrounded and know many in medicine and I don't know ANY who would stand for allowing a baby to be "deeemed non-viable" and left to die....outside of an abortion procedure and this thread isn't about that of course. Of course...I also know MANY MANY people with CNA to MD after their name who are pulling the plug and leaving medicine entirely too...and this is why. Things LIKE this.
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by elouina
So according to your statistics, 1.4 children out of a hundred are born under 3 pounds. Not very rare at all. In fact it is similar to the birth control pill failure rate.
No that would be 1.4% of all babies born.
I think it should be up to the parents as to if children under a pound should be "saved". Since they are the ones that would have to contend with possible complications. I think most would say yes, but at least then the ball is in their court.
Parents make emotional decisions. If parents were allowed to make the decision then we would be overwhelmed with unhealthy babies. Stop thinking emotionally, babies are a dime a dozen, we can make more.
Originally posted by elouina
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by elouina
So according to your statistics, 1.4 children out of a hundred are born under 3 pounds. Not very rare at all. In fact it is similar to the birth control pill failure rate.
No that would be 1.4% of all babies born.
>snip<
First to address the 1.4 % business. Oh my.... Same thing, just a different way of showing it....
>snip<