Skip to main content

Ring and Amazon slammed with a federal lawsuit over failed camera security


A new lawsuit targets Amazon and Ring, alleging the companies did not provide “robust” enough security to prevent hackers from gaining access to various smart home devices. The lawsuit, filed by Alabama resident John Baker Orange, follows Orange’s claim that a hacker breached his security cameras and began talking to his children while they played basketball outside.

As the world becomes more interconnected, cybersecurity concerns are inevitable. The numerous breaches that occurred over the past year have raised eyebrows — and now consumers are fighting back.

For parents, the idea of a stranger entering their home through their Wi-Fi network is a nightmare come true. A video has spread around the internet of a man speaking to an eight-year-old girl in her bedroom and trying to convince her that he is Santa Claus. That breach was specific to Amazon and Ring, but other companies are not immune to the problem. Nest has suffered numerous hacks of its own, including instances where hackers took control of a smart thermostat and manipulated the temperature inside a home.

The lawsuit against Amazon and Ring was filed Thursday in the U.S. District Court of the Central District of California, which makes it a federal lawsuit. John Baker Orange is represented by John Yanchunis. The lawsuit is focused around Amazon and Ring’s alleged negligence with regard to security practices. Ring blamed the security breaches on poor password practices and the lack of two-factor authentication, but Ring does not require users to enable two-factor authentication. The company has previously stated that it plans to improve security.

The class-action lawsuit holds Ring responsible for damages due to negligence, invasion of privacy, breach of the implied warranty, breach of the implied contract, unjust enrichment, and unfair competition. The total aggregated claims of class members in the suit exceed $5 million, exclusive of interests and costs.

The outcome of the lawsuit won’t be known for some time, but its existence might be enough to galvanize smart home companies to take action against subpar cybersecurity practices — and consumers to tighten their security. Though consumers should implement strong passwords, two-factor authentication, and any other protections available to them, cybersecurity is only as strong as its weakest point.

Editors' Recommendations

Patrick Hearn
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Patrick Hearn writes about smart home technology like Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, smart light bulbs, and more. If it's a…
Amazon to pay $30M in FTC settlements over Alexa, Ring privacy violations
Amazon logo on the headquarters building.

Amazon has agreed to pay $25 million to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to settle charges over privacy violations linked to its digital assistant, Alexa.

In a separate case, Amazon-owned Ring will pay $5.8 million for violations of users’ privacy.

Read more
The founder of Ring is leaving Amazon to join Latch
A person opening a Latch lock with their smartphone.

The founder of Ring, Jamie Siminoff, is officially leaving Amazon. The company was sold to the e-commerce giant in 2018, and after a few years serving as chief inventor, Siminoff is ready for a new challenge -- serving as the CEO of Latch, Inc.

Latch is a smart lock company and maker of LatchOS, a platform looking to make “spaces better places to live, work, and visit.” Not only will Siminoff be serving as its new CEO later this year, but the company has also acquired Honest Day’s Work (HDW), a platform founded by Siminoff that gives residential service providers (such as dog walkers, drivers, and housekeepers) an easier way to manage their businesses.

Read more
Ring’s new indoor camera features a built-in privacy shutter
The Ring Indoor Cam mounted on a wall.

Ring is launching a new Ring Indoor Cam on May 24, and it’ll be the first indoor camera in its catalog to include a privacy shutter. The shutter allows you to turn off both the camera and microphone, and it can be easily removed if you don’t need the additional privacy features.

The shutter can’t, however, be remotely activated. This means you’ll need to manually swivel the privacy shutter in front of the camera when you want to use it, then swivel it out of the way when you want to start recording again. Still, as the first Ring Indoor Cam to offer the feature, it’s definitely a step in the right direction.

Read more